6.3 Million Could Lose Food Assistance Under New USDA Policy

• by Shimanta Das
• November 11, 2026

The Trump administration has proposed a rule that could cut food stamp benefits for 6.3 million people, according to a new analysis. The move is part of a broader effort to tighten eligibility and reduce enrollment in the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP), the nation’s primary anti-hunger program. The proposal comes on the heels of a 2025 law enacted by Republican lawmakers that slashed federal spending on SNAP, tightened eligibility, and bolstered work requirements. Participation has already fallen by about 5% as a result.

The administration argues that states have used a policy known as “broad-based categorical eligibility” to “create a de facto and significant increase” in eligibility thresholds beyond limits established by Congress. This policy allows states to automatically enroll people who receive certain non-cash benefits, such as informational pamphlets or referrals, into SNAP. The USDA contends that this practice has expanded eligibility to people who may not truly need assistance. However, critics say the rule would strip benefits from millions of vulnerable Americans, including children, seniors, and people with disabilities.

The enrollment decline is partly due to struggles by states to implement administrative changes to the program and also to absorb significant new costs from Trump’s law. States are facing increased administrative burdens and financial pressures as they try to comply with new requirements. “Unfortunately, the Trump administration and the outgoing Republican majority in Congress have undermined the program’s integrity at every turn, harming millions of vulnerable Americans in the process,” said a spokesperson for a leading anti-hunger advocacy group. The proposed rule also has implications for children: 78 million children would lose automatic eligibility for free school meals, although about 97% would remain eligible for free or reduced-price meals through another certification process.

The public has until [deadline] to comment on the proposed rule. Advocacy groups are urging people to speak out against the changes, which they say would increase food insecurity and hardship. As the administration pushes forward with its agenda, the fate of millions of Americans who rely on food assistance hangs in the balance. For now, states and advocates are bracing for the impact of the new policy, which could take effect as early as [date].